GWILX vs. SHXPX
GWILX (Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio) and SHXPX (American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GWILX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for SHXPX.
Performance
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GWILX
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
SHXPX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio | 1.39% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWILX and SHXPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWILX vs. SHXPX — Risk / Return Rank
GWILX
SHXPX
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund (SHXPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWILX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWILX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 8.85 | -8.30 |
Drawdowns
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWILX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than SHXPX's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWILX and SHXPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWILX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -0.13% | -38.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -0.13% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -0.03% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWILX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.15% | 2.95% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 2.95% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 2.95% | +16.20% |
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWILX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SHXPX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWILX vs. SHXPX - Dividend Comparison
GWILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.28%, while SHXPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio | 93.28% | 94.11% | 13.95% | 5.36% | 3.42% | 21.17% | 0.94% | 0.92% | 4.73% | 1.17% | 1.44% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GWILX and SHXPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for GWILX and SHXPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer