GVLE vs. VFLO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GVLE (Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GVLE is actively managed, while VFLO is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVLE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.

Performance

GVLE vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLE achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 21.96% return.

GVLE

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 12.56%
• YTD: 15.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VFLO

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 3.40%
• 6M: 19.15%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 1Y: 35.29%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLE vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GVLE Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF	15.42%	4.29%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	21.96%	3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GVLE and VFLO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

GVLE vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 89
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLE vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVLE	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.27	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.21	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.06	—

Drawdowns

GVLE vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLE drawdown since its inception was -7.88%, smaller than the maximum VFLO drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLE and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVLE	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.88%	-17.79%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.55%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-2.46%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GVLE	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	15.65%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.95%	16.00%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.95%	16.00%	-2.05%

GVLE vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVLE vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

GVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VFLO's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GVLE Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF	1.01%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.12%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVLE and VFLO in my portfolio?

GVLE and VFLO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GVLE or VFLO?

On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVLE or VFLO?

VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVLE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVLE or VFLO?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.01% for GVLE.

What is the main difference between GVLE and VFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVLE and 0.39% for VFLO.