GVLE vs. FNDX
GVLE (Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GVLE is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVLE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
GVLE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVLE achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.60% return.
GVLE
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
GVLE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GVLE Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF | 15.42% | 4.29% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 16.60% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVLE and FNDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVLE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
GVLE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDX
GVLE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVLE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVLE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVLE drawdown since its inception was -7.88%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLE and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVLE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -37.72% | +29.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -3.54% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility
GVLE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVLE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 10.33% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 15.13% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 17.44% | -3.49% |
GVLE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVLE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVLE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
GVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FNDX's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
GVLE Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVLE and FNDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVLE.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.01% for GVLE.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVLE and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for GVLE and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer