PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVLE vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVLE vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLE achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 22.13% return.


GVLE

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.91%
6M
12.56%
YTD
15.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVB

1D
0.94%
1M
3.79%
6M
19.39%
YTD
22.13%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLE vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GVLE
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF
15.42%4.29%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
22.13%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GVLE and DIVB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVLE vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLE vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVLEDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

GVLE vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVLE vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLE drawdown since its inception was -7.88%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLE and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVLEDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-36.93%

+29.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-4.94%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

GVLE vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVLEDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

11.90%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

15.30%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.95%

18.34%

-4.39%

GVLE vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVLE vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

GVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than DIVB's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.17%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%
GVLE
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF
1.01%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVLE and DIVB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVLE.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.01% for GVLE.

GVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVLE and 0.05% for DIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVLE and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer