PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVLE vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVLE vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GVLE

1D
-2.20%
1M
1.23%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
-1.59%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLE vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GVLE and BPH is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVLE vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GVLE vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVLEBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.12

2.77

-0.64

Drawdowns

GVLE vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLE drawdown since its inception was -7.88%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLE and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVLEBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-2.35%

-5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.59%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-1.01%

-0.30%

Volatility

GVLE vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVLEBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

24.64%

-10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

24.64%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

24.64%

-10.78%

GVLE vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVLE vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

GVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%
GVLE
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF
1.05%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVLE and BPH have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVLE.

GVLE has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

GVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVLE and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVLE and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer