GVIP vs. IVVB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while IVVB is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares. GVIP is passively managed, while IVVB is actively managed. Over the past year, GVIP returned 35.53% vs 12.68% for IVVB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.

Performance

GVIP vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than IVVB's 3.81% return.

GVIP

• 1D: -6.01%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 35.53%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —

IVVB

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVIP vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	16.34%	25.27%	29.82%	14.59%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	3.81%	9.60%	18.66%	2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GVIP and IVVB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.84

The correlation between GVIP and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GVIP vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVIP

GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 54
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IVVB

IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 53
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVIP vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVIP	IVVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.72	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.41	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.22	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.04	9.43	+1.61

GVIP vs. IVVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IVVB Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVIP and IVVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVIP vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than IVVB's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and IVVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVIP	IVVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.09%	-13.08%	-24.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-5.75%	-7.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.01%	-0.88%	-5.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-1.59%	-5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	1.35%	+1.88%

Volatility

GVIP vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 1.74%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVIP	IVVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.43%	1.74%	+9.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.87%	5.49%	+12.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.01%	7.40%	+13.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.83%	9.25%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	9.25%	+12.62%

GVIP vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVIP vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison

GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than IVVB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	0.29%	0.34%	0.29%	0.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.12%	0.77%	0.44%	0.45%	0.08%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	1.18%	1.22%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVIP and IVVB in my portfolio?

GVIP and IVVB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVIP or IVVB?

GVIP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to IVVB (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs IVVB's -13.08%.

Which ETF is better, GVIP or IVVB?

On 1-year performance, GVIP leads with 35.53% vs 12.68% for IVVB. On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVIP or IVVB?

Over the 1-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 35.53% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVIP or IVVB?

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVIP or IVVB?

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

What is the main difference between GVIP and IVVB?

GVIP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVVB is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.50% for IVVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.