PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVAL vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVAL vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GVAL having a 14.37% return and VXUS slightly lower at 14.25%. Over the past 10 years, GVAL has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.


GVAL

1D
-1.24%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.37%
6M
15.35%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
10.76%

VXUS

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.68%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.92%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVAL vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
14.37%55.87%2.59%13.30%-7.98%10.70%-8.51%17.24%-14.30%29.50%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.25%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and VXUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014

0.82

The correlation between GVAL and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVAL vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVAL
VXUS

Financial Services

16.4%
22.3%

Basic Materials

8.2%
7.6%

Energy

7.8%
5.2%

Real Estate

7.0%
2.6%

Technology

6.4%
18.1%

Communication Services

4.6%
4.4%

Utilities

4.1%
3.2%

Industrials

3.6%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
5.0%

Healthcare

-

7.1%

Financial Services

GVAL
16.4%
VXUS
22.3%

Basic Materials

GVAL
8.2%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

GVAL
7.8%
VXUS
5.2%

Real Estate

GVAL
7.0%
VXUS
2.6%

Technology

GVAL
6.4%
VXUS
18.1%

Communication Services

GVAL
4.6%
VXUS
4.4%

Utilities

GVAL
4.1%
VXUS
3.2%

Industrials

GVAL
3.6%
VXUS
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GVAL
2.6%
VXUS
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

GVAL
1.9%
VXUS
5.0%

Healthcare

GVAL

-

VXUS
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVAL vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVAL
GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVAL vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVALVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

2.85

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

11.14

+2.19

GVAL vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVALVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.12

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.53

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.57

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVALVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-35.97%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-11.27%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-13.58%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-29.44%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-35.97%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.99%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-8.22%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.88%

+0.11%

Volatility

GVAL vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is 5.10%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that GVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVALVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

5.60%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

13.00%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

15.21%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

16.05%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

17.16%

+2.05%

GVAL vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVAL vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
2.83%2.93%4.75%6.12%5.05%2.97%1.90%2.84%4.65%2.00%2.54%2.11%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVAL and VXUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to GVAL (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 10.76% vs 9.76% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.05% for VXUS.

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVAL and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer