PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVAL vs. VEGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVAL vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than VEGA's 7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GVAL has outperformed VEGA with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VEGA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


GVAL

1D
-1.24%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.37%
6M
15.35%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
10.76%

VEGA

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.87%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVAL vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
14.37%55.87%2.59%13.30%-7.98%10.70%-8.51%17.24%-14.30%29.50%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
7.10%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%8.37%19.29%-6.58%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and VEGA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014

0.52

The correlation between GVAL and VEGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GVAL vs. VEGA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVAL
VEGA

Financial Services

16.4%
14.6%

Basic Materials

8.2%
2.6%

Energy

7.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

7.0%
1.8%

Technology

6.4%
31.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
9.3%

Utilities

4.1%
2.6%

Industrials

3.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
4.6%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Financial Services

GVAL
16.4%
VEGA
14.6%

Basic Materials

GVAL
8.2%
VEGA
2.6%

Energy

GVAL
7.8%
VEGA
3.5%

Real Estate

GVAL
7.0%
VEGA
1.8%

Technology

GVAL
6.4%
VEGA
31.7%

Communication Services

GVAL
4.6%
VEGA
9.3%

Utilities

GVAL
4.1%
VEGA
2.6%

Industrials

GVAL
3.6%
VEGA
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GVAL
2.6%
VEGA
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

GVAL
1.9%
VEGA
4.6%

Healthcare

GVAL

-

VEGA
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVAL vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVAL
GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVAL vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVALVEGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

2.76

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

12.41

+0.92

GVAL vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the VEGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and VEGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVALVEGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.09

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.59

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.53

-0.18

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than VEGA's maximum drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and VEGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVALVEGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-28.37%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-6.86%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-11.62%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-22.78%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-28.37%

-18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.52%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-3.79%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.52%

+1.47%

Volatility

GVAL vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.71%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVALVEGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

2.71%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

7.45%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

9.06%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

12.29%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

12.70%

+6.51%

GVAL vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVAL vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than VEGA's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
2.83%2.93%4.75%6.12%5.05%2.97%1.90%2.84%4.65%2.00%2.54%2.11%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.25%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVAL and VEGA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to VEGA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs VEGA's -28.37%.

On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 10.76% vs 7.95% for VEGA. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.25% for VEGA.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 2.02% for VEGA.

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVAL and VEGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer