GVAL vs. TAIL
GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while TAIL is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVAL returned 13.14%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. GVAL charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
GVAL vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 10.99% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and TAIL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.45 |
The correlation between GVAL and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (all time) to -0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVAL vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVAL
TAIL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
GVAL
TAIL
Basic Materials
GVAL
TAIL
Energy
GVAL
TAIL
Real Estate
GVAL
TAIL
Technology
GVAL
TAIL
Communication Services
GVAL
TAIL
Utilities
GVAL
TAIL
Industrials
GVAL
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
GVAL
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
GVAL
TAIL
Healthcare
GVAL
-
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
TAIL
GVAL vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVAL | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.83 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | -0.80 | +4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | -2.01 | +15.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVAL | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | -1.03 | +3.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.57 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.48 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -52.36% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -10.95% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -20.65% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -38.44% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -51.56% | +50.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -29.12% | +15.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 4.35% | -1.36% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 0.86% | +4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 6.45% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 8.51% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 14.90% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 14.94% | +4.27% |
GVAL vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVAL vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVAL and TAIL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, GVAL leads with 13.14% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 13.14% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.83% for GVAL.
GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.59% for TAIL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVAL and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer