GVAL vs. SHEH
GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and SHEH (Shell plc ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while SHEH is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Shell plc - Benchmark Price Return. GVAL is actively managed, while SHEH is passively managed. Over the past year, GVAL returned 40.34% vs 27.83% for SHEH. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GVAL charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SHEH.
Performance
GVAL vs. SHEH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly lower than SHEH's 25.14% return.
GVAL
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 40.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.96%
SHEH
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 23.06%
- YTD
- 25.14%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.55M | $5.48M | $6.45M | |
| $782.03K | $668.74K | $325.26K |
GVAL vs. SHEH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 20.34% | 29.85% |
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 25.14% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and SHEH is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.03 |
GVAL vs. SHEH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVAL
SHEH
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
GVAL
SHEH
-
Basic Materials
GVAL
SHEH
-
Energy
GVAL
SHEH
Technology
GVAL
SHEH
-
Real Estate
GVAL
SHEH
-
Utilities
GVAL
SHEH
-
Industrials
GVAL
SHEH
-
Communication Services
GVAL
SHEH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GVAL
SHEH
-
Consumer Defensive
GVAL
SHEH
-
Healthcare
GVAL
-
SHEH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. SHEH — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
SHEH
GVAL vs. SHEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVAL | SHEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.59 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | 4.35 | +8.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. SHEH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than SHEH's maximum drawdown of -17.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and SHEH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | SHEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -17.53% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -17.53% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.52% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -4.14% | -9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 6.41% | -3.30% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. SHEH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is 4.79%, while Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that GVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHEH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | SHEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 6.85% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 17.33% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 21.00% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 20.53% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 20.53% | -1.53% |
GVAL vs. SHEH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SHEH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVAL vs. SHEH - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than SHEH's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.37% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 1.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVAL and SHEH have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHEH has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to GVAL (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs SHEH's -17.53%.
On 1-year performance, GVAL leads with 40.34% vs 27.83% for SHEH. On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 40.34% return vs 27.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for GVAL.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.86% for SHEH.
GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while SHEH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for GVAL and 0.19% for SHEH.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVAL and SHEH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer