GVAL vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
GVAL and SCHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GVAL is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Mar 11, 2014. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
GVAL vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GVAL vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 6.95% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 4.58% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 4.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GVAL having a 10.04% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 9.59%.
GVAL
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 39.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GVAL vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
SCHF
GVAL vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVAL | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 1.76 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.40 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.75 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 10.59 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVAL | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.76 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.56 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and SCHF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GVAL vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than SCHF's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 3.02% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and SCHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -34.87% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -11.48% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -29.14% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | -34.87% | -11.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -7.16% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.04% | -7.44% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.98% | +0.07% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is 7.38%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that GVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 7.94% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 11.79% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 17.75% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.14% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 17.09% | +2.09% |