GVAL vs. GVALX
GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and GVALX (Gotham Large Value Fund) are both funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while GVALX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Gotham. Over the past 5 years, GVAL returned 13.14%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for GVALX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVAL charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GVALX.
Performance
GVAL vs. GVALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than GVALX's 9.53% return.
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
GVALX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL vs. GVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 7.47% |
GVALX Gotham Large Value Fund | 9.53% | 13.83% | 11.88% | 11.74% | -6.84% | 28.96% | 3.42% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and GVALX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GVAL and GVALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. GVALX — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
GVALX
GVAL vs. GVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVAL | GVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 2.90 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 10.03 | +3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVAL | GVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 1.96 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.61 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.58 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. GVALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than GVALX's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and GVALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | GVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -38.56% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -7.46% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -15.66% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -18.68% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -0.13% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -4.48% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.15% | +0.84% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. GVALX - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) at 2.87%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | GVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 2.87% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 8.05% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 11.03% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 15.39% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 19.51% | -0.30% |
GVAL vs. GVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GVALX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVAL vs. GVALX - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than GVALX's 10.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
GVALX Gotham Large Value Fund | 10.78% | 11.81% | 10.72% | 9.77% | 7.59% | 18.49% | 1.61% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVAL and GVALX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to GVALX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs GVALX's -38.56%.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVAL and GVALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer