GVAL vs. EVSD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and EVSD (Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while EVSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GVAL returned 40.92% vs 4.77% for EVSD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GVAL charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EVSD.

Performance

GVAL vs. EVSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than EVSD's 0.91% return.

GVAL

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 40.92%
• 3Y*: 26.84%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

EVSD

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVAL vs. EVSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	16.63%	55.87%	1.17%
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	0.91%	6.80%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and EVSD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024	0.25

The correlation between GVAL and EVSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GVAL vs. EVSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

EVSD

EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 90
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVAL vs. EVSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVAL	EVSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	3.05	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	4.88	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.65	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	3.72	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	15.56	-2.30

GVAL vs. EVSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the EVSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and EVSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. EVSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than EVSD's maximum drawdown of -1.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and EVSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVAL	EVSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.82%	-1.26%	-45.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-1.26%	-10.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-0.19%	-13.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	0.30%	+2.72%

Volatility

GVAL vs. EVSD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) at 0.55%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVAL	EVSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	0.55%	+5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	1.18%	+12.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	1.54%	+13.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.56%	1.94%	+16.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	1.94%	+17.26%

GVAL vs. EVSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than EVSD's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVAL vs. EVSD - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than EVSD's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	4.61%	4.64%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.77%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVAL and EVSD in my portfolio?

GVAL and EVSD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVAL or EVSD?

GVAL has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to EVSD (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs EVSD's -1.26%.

Which ETF is better, GVAL or EVSD?

On 1-year performance, GVAL leads with 40.92% vs 4.77% for EVSD. On fees, EVSD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EVSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVAL or EVSD?

Over the 1-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 40.92% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVAL or EVSD?

EVSD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVAL or EVSD?

EVSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.77% for GVAL.

What is the main difference between GVAL and EVSD?

GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while EVSD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.24% for EVSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.