GURU vs. SPXM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GURU is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, GURU returned 25.07% vs 8.72% for SPXM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.

Performance

GURU vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GURU

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 8.33%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 25.07%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 12.07%

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 8.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	8.49%	16.43%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and SPXM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

GURU vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU

GURU Risk / Return Rank: 56
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

SPXM

SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 60
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GURU	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.40	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.98	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.11	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	9.87	-1.81

GURU vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GURU vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and SPXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GURU	SPXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.50%	-5.08%	-33.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.22%	-5.08%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-0.75%	-2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-0.78%	-7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	—	—

Volatility

GURU vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GURU	SPXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	0.00%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.41%	3.78%	+9.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.28%	7.65%	+8.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	7.59%	+12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.15%	7.59%	+12.56%

GURU vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GURU vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	0.08%	0.11%	0.17%	0.57%	0.22%	0.09%	2.75%	0.35%	0.54%	0.54%	0.22%	0.47%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GURU and SPXM in my portfolio?

GURU and SPXM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GURU or SPXM?

GURU has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

Which ETF is better, GURU or SPXM?

On 1-year performance, GURU leads with 25.07% vs 8.72% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GURU or SPXM?

Over the 1-year period, GURU has performed better with a 25.07% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GURU or SPXM?

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GURU or SPXM?

SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.08% for GURU.

What is the main difference between GURU and SPXM?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.47% for SPXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GURU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.