GURU vs. BUFX
GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GURU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Guru Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
GURU vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
GURU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GURU vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 7.06% | 18.22% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GURU and BUFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GURU vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
GURU
BUFX
GURU vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 2.68 | -2.04 |
Drawdowns
GURU vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -2.87% | -35.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.07% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -0.24% | -8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
GURU vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GURU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 3.98% | +11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 3.98% | +16.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 3.98% | +16.18% |
GURU vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
GURU vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GURU and BUFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GURU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GURU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
GURU has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
GURU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for GURU and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer