GURU vs. AFOS
GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
GURU vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
GURU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GURU vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 7.06% | 17.13% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GURU and AFOS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GURU vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
GURU
AFOS
GURU vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURU | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURU | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 4.35 | -3.70 |
Drawdowns
GURU vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURU | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -11.52% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.29% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -1.37% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
GURU vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GURU | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 20.19% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 20.19% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 20.19% | -0.03% |
GURU vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GURU vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GURU and AFOS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for GURU and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer