PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUNR vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUNR vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GUNR having a 19.20% return and TURF slightly higher at 19.55%.


GUNR

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.04%
YTD
19.20%
6M
21.67%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
11.17%

TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUNR vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUNR and TURF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.95

GUNR vs. TURF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUNR
TURF

Basic Materials

44.3%
33.9%

Energy

30.6%
29.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.4%
8.5%

Utilities

4.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

2.6%
2.3%

Industrials

2.3%
1.6%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.8%

Technology

0.5%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Basic Materials

GUNR
44.3%
TURF
33.9%

Energy

GUNR
30.6%
TURF
29.2%

Consumer Defensive

GUNR
11.4%
TURF
8.5%

Utilities

GUNR
4.0%
TURF
0.3%

Financial Services

GUNR
2.6%
TURF
2.3%

Industrials

GUNR
2.3%
TURF
1.6%

Communication Services

GUNR
1.6%
TURF
3.8%

Technology

GUNR
0.5%
TURF
0.4%

Real Estate

GUNR
0.2%
TURF

-

Consumer Cyclical

GUNR
0.2%
TURF

-

Healthcare

GUNR

-

TURF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUNR vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TURF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUNR vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUNRTURFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.21

GUNR vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUNRTURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

2.52

-2.19

Drawdowns

GUNR vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUNRTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.64%

-6.84%

-38.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-2.54%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-1.53%

-8.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

Volatility

GUNR vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUNRTURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

16.50%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

16.50%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

16.50%

+3.92%

GUNR vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUNR vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than TURF's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.24%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GUNR and TURF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUNR and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer