TURF vs. CSNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TURF (T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TURF charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.

Performance

TURF vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TURF achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSNR's 21.88% return.

TURF

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 22.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSNR

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 21.88%
• 6M: 24.62%
• 1Y: 47.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TURF vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	19.55%	17.05%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	21.88%	18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TURF and CSNR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

TURF vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 86
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TURF vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TURF	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	1.97	+0.55

Drawdowns

TURF vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TURF drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum CSNR drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TURF and CSNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TURF	CSNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-15.33%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-1.42%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.82%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TURF	CSNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.50%	16.94%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	19.77%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	19.77%	-3.27%

TURF vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TURF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TURF vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison

TURF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than CSNR's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	1.98%	2.39%
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	1.25%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TURF and CSNR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TURF and CSNR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TURF or CSNR?

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TURF or CSNR?

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TURF or CSNR?

CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

What is the main difference between TURF and CSNR?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TURF and 0.50% for CSNR.