GUNR vs. ITB
GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUNR is a Natural Resources fund tracking the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GUNR returned 10.65%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for ITB. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUNR charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
GUNR vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 10.65%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.
GUNR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
ITB
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
GUNR vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 11.59% | 30.03% | -8.37% | -2.40% | 14.83% | 26.06% | 0.46% | 18.41% | -9.42% | 18.74% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.44% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUNR and ITB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011 | 0.45 |
The correlation between GUNR and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GUNR vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUNR
ITB
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
GUNR
ITB
Energy
GUNR
ITB
-
Consumer Defensive
GUNR
ITB
-
Utilities
GUNR
ITB
-
Financial Services
GUNR
ITB
-
Industrials
GUNR
ITB
Communication Services
GUNR
ITB
-
Technology
GUNR
ITB
-
Real Estate
GUNR
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
GUNR
ITB
Healthcare
GUNR
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUNR vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
GUNR
ITB
GUNR vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUNR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.08 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 0.36 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 0.68 | +11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUNR vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUNR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.64% | -86.53% | +40.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -26.04% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -33.35% | +13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -40.55% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.04% | -52.10% | +9.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.78% | -23.10% | +14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -37.06% | +26.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 13.64% | -11.35% |
Volatility
GUNR vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is 5.11%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that GUNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUNR | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 8.66% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 21.41% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 30.00% | -14.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 29.37% | -10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 30.10% | -9.67% |
GUNR vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUNR vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than ITB's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUNR and ITB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUNR dropped -45.64% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 14.54% vs 10.65% for GUNR. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.
GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.66% for ITB.
GUNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while ITB is Building & Construction. GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.38% for ITB.
GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUNR and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer