GUNR vs. ITB
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB).
GUNR and ITB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUNR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2011. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. Both GUNR and ITB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GUNR or ITB.
Key characteristics
| GUNR | ITB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.58% | 16.44% |
| 1Y Return | 0.25% | 36.84% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.14% | 16.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.55% | 22.14% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.09% | 17.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.19 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.36 | 2.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.17 | 2.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.55 | 7.50 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.26% | 6.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.01% | 26.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.64% | -86.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.46% | -8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUNR and ITB is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GUNR vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than ITB's 16.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 5.09%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUNR vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GUNR vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GUNR vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than ITB's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 3.55% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.28% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% | 2.80% | 2.03% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
GUNR vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and ITB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GUNR vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is 3.56%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that GUNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.