PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUNR vs. ITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUNR vs. ITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 10.65%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.


GUNR

1D
-0.10%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.39%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
10.65%

ITB

1D
-1.92%
1M
7.18%
YTD
1.44%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUNR vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
11.59%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%26.06%0.46%18.41%-9.42%18.74%
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.44%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GUNR and ITB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011

0.45

The correlation between GUNR and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUNR vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUNR
ITB

Basic Materials

49.4%
8.7%

Energy

29.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.1%

-

Utilities

4.4%

-

Financial Services

2.9%

-

Industrials

2.6%
19.5%

Communication Services

1.7%

-

Technology

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
71.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Basic Materials

GUNR
49.4%
ITB
8.7%

Energy

GUNR
29.6%
ITB

-

Consumer Defensive

GUNR
12.1%
ITB

-

Utilities

GUNR
4.4%
ITB

-

Financial Services

GUNR
2.9%
ITB

-

Industrials

GUNR
2.6%
ITB
19.5%

Communication Services

GUNR
1.7%
ITB

-

Technology

GUNR
0.5%
ITB

-

Real Estate

GUNR
0.3%
ITB
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GUNR
0.2%
ITB
71.3%

Healthcare

GUNR

-

ITB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUNR vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUNR vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUNRITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.08

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.36

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

0.68

+11.99

GUNR vs. ITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the ITB Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUNR and ITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUNR vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and ITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUNRITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.64%

-86.53%

+40.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-26.04%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-33.35%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

-40.55%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

-52.10%

+9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-23.10%

+14.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-37.06%

+26.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

13.64%

-11.35%

Volatility

GUNR vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is 5.11%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that GUNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUNRITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

8.66%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

21.41%

-8.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

30.00%

-14.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

29.37%

-10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.43%

30.10%

-9.67%

GUNR vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUNR vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison

GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than ITB's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.40%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
0.66%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUNR and ITB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITB has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUNR dropped -45.64% vs ITB's -86.53%.

On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 14.54% vs 10.65% for GUNR. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.66% for ITB.

GUNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while ITB is Building & Construction. GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.38% for ITB.

GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUNR and ITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer