GUNR vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GUNR returned 9.47%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for FLTW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUNR charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

GUNR vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 65.68% return.

GUNR

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 6M: 17.02%
• 1Y: 34.03%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

FLTW

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 65.68%
• 6M: 71.97%
• 1Y: 100.51%
• 3Y*: 39.63%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUNR vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund	15.74%	30.03%	-8.37%	-2.40%	14.83%	26.06%	0.46%	18.41%	-9.42%	4.65%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	65.68%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	29.46%	29.77%	31.23%	-9.32%	-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GUNR and FLTW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.51

The correlation between GUNR and FLTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUNR vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUNR	FLTW
Basic Materials	45.1%	2.9%
Energy	29.3%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	11.5%	0.9%
Utilities	4.0%	-
Financial Services	2.7%	12.6%
Industrials	2.3%	4.0%
Communication Services	1.7%	1.6%
Technology	0.5%	75.6%
Real Estate	0.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	1.7%
Healthcare	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

GUNR vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUNR

GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 80
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUNR vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUNR	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	3.62	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	4.02	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.58	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	9.29	-4.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.53	27.95	-11.42

GUNR vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUNR and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUNR vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUNR	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.64%	-38.00%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.77%	-10.87%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.59%	-26.45%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.06%	-38.00%	+13.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-4.47%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.39%	-8.42%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	3.61%	-1.55%

Volatility

GUNR vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is 5.11%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 15.27%. This indicates that GUNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUNR	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	15.27%	-10.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.13%	23.85%	-10.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	27.98%	-12.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	22.90%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	22.03%	-1.59%

GUNR vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUNR vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than FLTW's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.51%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund	2.31%	2.81%	3.39%	3.55%	4.12%	3.61%	2.79%	3.25%	3.27%	2.00%	1.73%	4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUNR and FLTW in my portfolio?

GUNR and FLTW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUNR or FLTW?

FLTW has higher volatility (15.27%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUNR dropped -45.64% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which ETF is better, GUNR or FLTW?

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 20.89% vs 9.47% for GUNR. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUNR or FLTW?

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUNR or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUNR or FLTW?

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.51% for FLTW.

What is the main difference between GUNR and FLTW?

GUNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.19% for FLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.