PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Knight Therapeutics Inc. (GUD.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUD.TO achieves a 37.36% return, which is significantly higher than FTS.TO's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GUD.TO has underperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of -0.35%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.


GUD.TO

1D
1.34%
1M
10.07%
YTD
37.36%
6M
37.58%
1Y
43.28%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
-0.35%

FTS.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.30%
6M
8.41%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUD.TO
Knight Therapeutics Inc.
37.36%13.30%2.89%0.19%-2.26%-0.93%-29.42%-1.43%-7.46%-22.63%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.
8.30%23.93%14.24%4.76%-7.87%21.81%0.04%22.71%2.74%15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GUD.TO and FTS.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2014

0.10

The correlation between GUD.TO and FTS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GUD.TO:

CA$822.08M

FTS.TO:

CA$38.65B

EPS

GUD.TO:

CA$0.06

FTS.TO:

CA$3.56

PE Ratio

GUD.TO:

147.17

FTS.TO:

21.33

PS Ratio

GUD.TO:

1.62

FTS.TO:

3.15

PB Ratio

GUD.TO:

1.04

FTS.TO:

1.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

GUD.TO:

CA$510.45M

FTS.TO:

CA$12.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GUD.TO:

CA$190.52M

FTS.TO:

CA$3.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

GUD.TO:

CA$65.18M

FTS.TO:

CA$5.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUD.TO
GUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FTS.TO
FTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knight Therapeutics Inc. (GUD.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUD.TOFTS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.04

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

7.25

-0.37

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUD.TO and FTS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUD.TOFTS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.43

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.75

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.62

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.65

-0.40

Drawdowns

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUD.TO and FTS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUD.TOFTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-35.48%

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-6.09%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-11.22%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-24.01%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

-28.27%

-31.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.76%

-4.32%

-19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-6.52%

-27.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

2.63%

+3.68%

Volatility

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Knight Therapeutics Inc. (GUD.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) at 4.84%. This indicates that GUD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUD.TOFTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

4.84%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

10.39%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.01%

12.93%

+11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

14.41%

+9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

16.84%

+7.24%

Dividends

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

GUD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.
3.34%3.48%3.99%4.19%4.01%3.36%3.73%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%
GUD.TO
Knight Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knight Therapeutics Inc. and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
148.44M
3.38B
(GUD.TO) Total Revenue
(FTS.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

GUD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Knight Therapeutics Inc. and Fortis Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.7%
27.6%
Portfolio components
GUD.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight Therapeutics Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.44M and revenue of 148.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

FTS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a gross profit of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

GUD.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight Therapeutics Inc. reported an operating income of 10.58M and revenue of 148.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

FTS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported an operating income of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.

GUD.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight Therapeutics Inc. reported a net income of 13.17M and revenue of 148.44M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

FTS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a net income of 523.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GUD.TO and FTS.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUD.TO and FTS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer