PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTTX vs. ICISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTTTX having a 21.83% return and ICISX slightly lower at 21.34%. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed ICISX with an annualized return of 14.66%, while ICISX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.


GTTTX

1D
1.91%
1M
4.27%
YTD
21.83%
6M
18.83%
1Y
47.73%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
14.66%

ICISX

1D
1.49%
1M
5.46%
YTD
21.34%
6M
19.05%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
21.83%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
21.34%8.38%11.15%14.13%-13.57%34.53%9.95%20.26%-17.54%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and ICISX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.96

The correlation between GTTTX and ICISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. ICISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ICISX
ICISX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICISX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ICISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTTXICISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

4.83

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

16.73

+1.60

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the ICISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and ICISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, smaller than the maximum ICISX drawdown of -59.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and ICISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTTXICISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-59.91%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-9.50%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.29%

-28.05%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-28.05%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

-49.01%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-10.79%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.68%

-0.09%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX) at 5.00%. This indicates that GTTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTTXICISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.00%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

11.91%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

17.24%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.35%

21.68%

+13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.83%

23.69%

+7.14%

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ICISX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTTX vs. ICISX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, less than ICISX's 23.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
6.89%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
23.03%27.95%11.14%7.68%17.24%0.74%4.30%13.90%14.67%4.45%4.26%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTTTX and ICISX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to ICISX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs ICISX's -59.91%.

ICISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTTX and ICISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer