GTTTX vs. GCIIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) and GCIIX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund) are both mutual funds - GTTTX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GCIIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX returned 14.25%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for GCIIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTTTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for GCIIX.

Performance

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTTX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than GCIIX's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 14.25%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.

GTTTX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 17.75%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 43.68%
• 3Y*: 30.38%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: 14.25%

GCIIX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 6M: 14.36%
• 1Y: 29.06%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	17.75%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-10.83%	7.34%
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	11.72%	40.72%	9.65%	20.80%	-14.91%	11.71%	7.83%	18.52%	-15.82%	29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and GCIIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.70

The correlation between GTTTX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

GCIIX

GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTTTX	GCIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	1.95	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.71	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.35	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	2.41	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.70	9.02	+7.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTTTX	GCIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	1.95	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.74	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.65	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.31	+0.05

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, smaller than the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and GCIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTTTX	GCIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.58%	-61.08%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-12.33%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.29%	-13.25%	-26.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.29%	-30.58%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.29%	-39.85%	-7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-0.78%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-15.04%	+5.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	3.29%	-0.69%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) at 4.75%. This indicates that GTTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTTTX	GCIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	4.75%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.22%	12.73%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.38%	15.29%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.35%	16.11%	+19.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.81%	16.79%	+14.02%

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTTTX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than GCIIX's 6.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	6.97%	7.78%	9.24%	2.81%	3.94%	6.33%	1.86%	2.46%	1.94%	1.62%	2.51%	1.45%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	7.13%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTTTX and GCIIX in my portfolio?

GTTTX and GCIIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTTTX or GCIIX?

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GCIIX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.