GTTTX vs. FIKNX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) and FIKNX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GTTTX returned 16.41%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for FIKNX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GTTTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FIKNX.

Performance

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTTX achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly lower than FIKNX's 26.39% return.

GTTTX

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 15.98%
• YTD: 22.04%
• 1Y: 37.95%
• 3Y*: 30.53%
• 5Y*: 16.41%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

FIKNX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 3.06%
• 6M: 20.20%
• YTD: 26.39%
• 1Y: 34.80%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	22.04%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-15.27%
FIKNX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z	26.39%	8.18%	8.00%	17.97%	-12.98%	38.27%	11.35%	20.98%	-13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and FIKNX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.96

The correlation between GTTTX and FIKNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. FIKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FIKNX

FIKNX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FIKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FIKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FIKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FIKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FIKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTTTX	FIKNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.90	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.85	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	3.32	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	11.59	+2.82

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FIKNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and FIKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, which is greater than FIKNX's maximum drawdown of -44.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and FIKNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTTTX	FIKNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.58%	-44.09%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-10.35%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.29%	-24.87%	-14.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.29%	-24.87%	-14.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-1.82%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-7.57%	-2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.96%	-0.35%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) is 4.34%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that GTTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTTTX	FIKNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	5.37%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.63%	13.62%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	18.09%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.31%	20.95%	+14.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.76%	24.55%	+6.21%

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKNX's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTTTX vs. FIKNX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, less than FIKNX's 8.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKNX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z	8.11%	10.24%	4.82%	5.32%	5.92%	8.07%	0.58%	3.65%	8.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	6.88%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTTTX and FIKNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GTTTX and FIKNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GTTTX or FIKNX?

FIKNX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to GTTTX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs FIKNX's -44.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.