PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSGX vs. VSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSGX achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than VSEQX's 15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX has underperformed VSEQX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while VSEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.


GTSGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
10.36%

VSEQX

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.34%
YTD
15.17%
6M
15.25%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-2.11%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
15.17%15.32%16.67%19.31%-11.90%30.83%10.26%26.76%-11.86%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSGX and VSEQX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 1995

0.87

The correlation between GTSGX and VSEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSGX vs. VSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VSEQX
VSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTSGXVSEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

4.51

-4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

17.34

-17.49

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the VSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSGX and VSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTSGXVSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.28

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.59

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.61

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.50

-0.35

Drawdowns

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than VSEQX's maximum drawdown of -63.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and VSEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSGXVSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

-63.55%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-7.60%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-24.73%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

-24.73%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

-44.08%

+5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

-0.76%

-7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.69%

-9.06%

-20.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

1.97%

+2.89%

Volatility

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX) at 3.71%. This indicates that GTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSGXVSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

3.71%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

10.63%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

15.05%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

19.95%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

21.42%

-3.35%

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VSEQX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSGX vs. VSEQX - Dividend Comparison

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than VSEQX's 9.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.44%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
9.69%11.16%11.36%6.11%11.77%21.36%1.77%2.92%10.34%7.05%3.13%12.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTSGX and VSEQX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to VSEQX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSGX dropped -73.82% vs VSEQX's -63.55%.

VSEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSGX and VSEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer