GTSGX vs. DNLDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTSGX (Madison Mid Cap Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX returned 10.41%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTSGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.

Performance

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSGX achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 11.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTSGX having a 10.41% annualized return and DNLDX not far behind at 10.01%.

GTSGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: -1.68%
• 6M: -1.41%
• 1Y: -0.33%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

DNLDX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 21.00%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund	-1.68%	1.62%	10.24%	26.51%	-13.60%	26.31%	9.45%	33.53%	-1.60%	15.65%
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	11.73%	9.79%	22.27%	16.99%	-14.34%	26.49%	9.29%	16.82%	-14.46%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSGX and DNLDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990	0.85

The correlation between GTSGX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTSGX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSGX

GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

DNLDX

DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 44
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTSGX	DNLDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	1.70	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	2.46	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.29	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	3.05	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	11.45	-11.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSGX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTSGX	DNLDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	1.70	-1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.57	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.51	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.55	-0.40

Drawdowns

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than DNLDX's maximum drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and DNLDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTSGX	DNLDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.82%	-63.69%	-10.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	-7.29%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-20.42%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.94%	-23.42%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.25%	-42.23%	+3.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.49%	0.00%	-7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.69%	-9.63%	-20.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	1.94%	+2.89%

Volatility

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 3.36%. This indicates that GTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTSGX	DNLDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.36%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	9.55%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	13.10%	+1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	18.48%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	19.51%	-1.44%

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTSGX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than DNLDX's 13.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.45%	14.15%	15.24%	1.69%	8.82%	17.74%	2.77%	2.65%	11.14%	11.32%	1.00%	3.12%
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund	3.43%	3.37%	5.76%	1.25%	1.96%	4.38%	3.43%	3.74%	7.57%	3.58%	4.34%	6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTSGX and DNLDX in my portfolio?

GTSGX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTSGX or DNLDX?

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DNLDX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSGX dropped -73.82% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.