PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSGX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GTSGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.41%

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTSGX and ATGAX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSGX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTSGXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTSGXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

58.33

-58.19

Drawdowns

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSGXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

0.00%

-73.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

0.00%

-7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.69%

0.00%

-29.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

Volatility

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSGXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

9.26%

+5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

9.26%

+8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

9.26%

+8.81%

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSGX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.43%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTSGX and ATGAX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSGX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer