GTRFX vs. QAMNX
GTRFX (Gotham Total Return Fund) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, GTRFX returned 17.15%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for QAMNX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTRFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.
Performance
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTRFX achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -0.14% return.
GTRFX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
QAMNX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund | 7.43% | 15.31% | 15.73% | 15.29% | -9.82% | 10.23% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | -0.14% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTRFX and QAMNX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTRFX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank
GTRFX
QAMNX
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTRFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.10 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 0.76 | +2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | 1.74 | +11.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTRFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 0.48 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.82 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and QAMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTRFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.58% | -17.97% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -4.16% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -4.16% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -2.16% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -5.15% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison
Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) have volatilities of 2.24% and 2.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTRFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 2.24% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 5.11% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.74% | 6.66% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 13.86% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 13.86% | +0.02% |
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison
GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than QAMNX's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund | 8.87% | 9.53% | 11.50% | 7.27% | 10.25% | 4.66% | 0.71% | 6.06% | 1.48% | 0.33% | 0.05% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTRFX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAMNX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to GTRFX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRFX dropped -29.58% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.
GTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTRFX and QAMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer