PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTRFX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTRFX achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -0.14% return.


GTRFX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.87%
YTD
7.43%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
9.21%

QAMNX

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.38%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
2.25%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
7.43%15.31%15.73%15.29%-9.82%10.23%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
-0.14%10.00%17.33%4.71%9.19%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRFX and QAMNX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTRFX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTRFX
GTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTRFXQAMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.10

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

0.76

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

1.74

+11.28

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRFX and QAMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTRFXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.48

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.82

-0.16

Drawdowns

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and QAMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRFXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-17.97%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-4.16%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-4.16%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.16%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-5.15%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.80%

-0.21%

Volatility

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) have volatilities of 2.24% and 2.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRFXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

2.24%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

5.11%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.74%

6.66%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

13.86%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

13.86%

+0.02%

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than QAMNX's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
8.87%9.53%11.50%7.27%10.25%4.66%0.71%6.06%1.48%0.33%0.05%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.53%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTRFX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QAMNX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to GTRFX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRFX dropped -29.58% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.

GTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTRFX and QAMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer