PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTRFX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTRFX achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's 4.61% return.


GTRFX

1D
0.48%
1M
2.93%
6M
8.06%
YTD
10.65%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
9.17%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

QAMNX

1D
0.54%
1M
3.68%
6M
5.25%
YTD
4.61%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
10.65%15.31%15.73%15.29%-9.82%10.99%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
4.61%10.00%17.33%4.71%9.19%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRFX and QAMNX is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTRFX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTRFX
GTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTRFXQAMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.18

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

4.83

+7.48

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRFX and QAMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and QAMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRFXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-17.97%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-4.16%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-4.16%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-5.03%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.87%

-0.24%

Volatility

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 1.55%. This indicates that GTRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRFXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

1.55%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

4.50%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

6.74%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.68%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

13.68%

+0.16%

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTRFX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than QAMNX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
8.62%9.53%11.50%7.27%10.25%4.66%0.71%6.06%1.48%0.33%0.05%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.46%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTRFX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTRFX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to QAMNX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRFX dropped -29.58% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.

GTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTRFX and QAMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer