PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTRFX vs. FLSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTRFX having a 10.65% return and FLSPX slightly lower at 10.62%. Over the past 10 years, GTRFX has underperformed FLSPX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while FLSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


GTRFX

1D
0.48%
1M
2.93%
6M
8.06%
YTD
10.65%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
9.17%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

FLSPX

1D
1.77%
1M
0.60%
6M
7.28%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
23.47%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
10.65%15.31%15.73%15.29%-9.82%27.83%-11.41%12.57%-1.73%18.93%
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
10.62%16.15%27.96%14.00%-11.49%20.56%-0.23%13.03%-3.96%19.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRFX and FLSPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.81

The correlation between GTRFX and FLSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTRFX vs. FLSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTRFX
GTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSPX
FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTRFXFLSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.49

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

10.08

+2.23

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FLSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRFX and FLSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than FLSPX's maximum drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and FLSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRFXFLSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-27.07%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.73%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-16.23%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

-20.01%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.58%

-27.07%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.07%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-5.63%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.15%

-0.52%

Volatility

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) is 2.49%, while Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that GTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRFXFLSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

3.35%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

10.13%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

12.98%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

13.61%

+0.23%

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FLSPX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTRFX vs. FLSPX - Dividend Comparison

GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than FLSPX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
4.10%4.32%17.39%8.41%2.81%5.55%0.09%0.96%1.26%6.78%2.52%1.55%
GTRFX
Gotham Total Return Fund
8.62%9.53%11.50%7.27%10.25%4.66%0.71%6.06%1.48%0.33%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTRFX and FLSPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSPX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to GTRFX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRFX dropped -29.58% vs FLSPX's -27.07%.

GTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTRFX and FLSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer