PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTRAX vs. PBHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTRAX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than PBHAX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GTRAX has underperformed PBHAX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while PBHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


GTRAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.54%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
1.51%

PBHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTRAX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund
0.41%10.63%-0.37%8.37%-22.39%-6.36%9.79%14.99%-1.88%13.25%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
1.69%8.79%6.89%10.75%-12.51%5.63%4.87%15.86%-1.53%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRAX and PBHAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 1990

0.23

Over the past year, GTRAX and PBHAX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTRAX vs. PBHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTRAX
GTRAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GTRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GTRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PBHAX
PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTRAXPBHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.54

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

3.08

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

15.43

-13.00

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the PBHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRAX and PBHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTRAXPBHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.15

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.66

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.95

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.35

-1.09

Drawdowns

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than PBHAX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRAX and PBHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRAXPBHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-28.80%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-2.48%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-4.06%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.81%

-16.22%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

-21.14%

-12.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.95%

0.00%

-12.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-2.87%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.49%

+1.04%

Volatility

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) at 1.16%. This indicates that GTRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRAXPBHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.16%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

2.71%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.34%

3.56%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

5.06%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.25%

5.49%

+0.76%

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PBHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTRAX vs. PBHAX - Dividend Comparison

GTRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than PBHAX's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTRAX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund
3.66%3.67%3.82%3.02%3.22%3.03%3.63%8.40%3.40%3.17%3.70%3.55%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
6.73%6.71%6.01%5.73%5.94%5.88%5.70%5.96%6.26%5.98%4.61%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTRAX and PBHAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTRAX has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to PBHAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRAX dropped -33.63% vs PBHAX's -28.80%.

PBHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTRAX and PBHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer