GTR vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. GTR is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, GTR returned 20.40% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

GTR vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.

GTR

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 20.40%
• 3Y*: 12.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	8.84%	11.11%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

GTR vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTR	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	4.18	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	6.39	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.06	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	7.59	-4.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	44.07	-30.58

GTR vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTR vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTR	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-0.52%	-20.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-0.52%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.51%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-0.07%	-8.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	0.09%	+1.42%

Volatility

GTR vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that GTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTR	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	0.36%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.15%	0.85%	+6.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.71%	0.95%	+8.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.88%	1.07%	+9.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.88%	1.07%	+9.81%

GTR vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTR vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.28%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTR and RBIL in my portfolio?

GTR and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTR or RBIL?

GTR has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, GTR or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, GTR leads with 20.40% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTR or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, GTR has performed better with a 20.40% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTR or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTR or RBIL?

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between GTR and RBIL?

GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.