PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOP vs. PXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOP vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOP achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 40.12% return.


GTOP

1D
1.64%
1M
-2.18%
6M
19.54%
YTD
19.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PXQ

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.96%
6M
31.73%
YTD
40.12%
1Y
63.92%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$535.54K$741.71K$641.89K
$741.37K$822.66K$837.91K

GTOP vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTOP and PXQ is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOP vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTOP vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOPPXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

GTOP vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTOP vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and PXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOPPXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-57.18%

+42.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-14.80%

+8.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-10.73%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

Volatility

GTOP vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOPPXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

27.67%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

24.48%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

23.55%

+1.49%

GTOP vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOP vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

GTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GTOP
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.68%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOP and PXQ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.00% for GTOP.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.40% for PXQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOP and PXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer