GTOC vs. SPHD
GTOC (Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. GTOC is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTOC charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
GTOC vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 5.63% return.
GTOC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
GTOC vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF | 0.50% | 3.52% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 5.63% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOC and SPHD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOC vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
GTOC
SPHD
GTOC vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOC | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.58 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
GTOC vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOC | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -41.39% | +38.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -4.24% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -4.70% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility
GTOC vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOC | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 11.10% | -7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 14.17% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 17.64% | -14.03% |
GTOC vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOC vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than SPHD's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF | 3.64% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.57% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOC and SPHD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GTOC is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GTOC is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.64% for GTOC.
GTOC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SPHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.30% for SPHD.
Find the right allocation for GTOC and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer