PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOC vs. EDGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOC vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than EDGF's 0.90% return.


GTOC

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDGF

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOC vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GTOC
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
0.39%3.52%
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
0.90%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOC and EDGF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOC vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOC

EDGF
EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOC vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GTOC vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTOCEDGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.98

+0.29

Drawdowns

GTOC vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and EDGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOCEDGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-1.62%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.07%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-0.46%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

GTOC vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOCEDGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

1.94%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.62%

2.35%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

2.35%

+1.27%

GTOC vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOC vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.45%3.61%0.49%
GTOC
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
3.64%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOC and EDGF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GTOC is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GTOC is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

GTOC has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.79% for EDGF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOC and EDGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer