GTO vs. VWEHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and VWEHX (Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares) are both funds - GTO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while VWEHX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, GTO returned 2.95%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for VWEHX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for VWEHX.

Performance

GTO vs. VWEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than VWEHX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has underperformed VWEHX with an annualized return of 2.95%, while VWEHX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.15% annualized return.

GTO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: 2.95%

VWEHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 7.01%
• 3Y*: 8.17%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 5.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. VWEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	0.83%	7.17%	2.63%	5.95%	-14.77%	-0.38%	10.86%	11.65%	-0.26%	7.41%
VWEHX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares	1.16%	9.38%	6.33%	11.66%	-9.04%	2.97%	5.30%	15.81%	-2.93%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and VWEHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016	0.31

The correlation between GTO and VWEHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GTO vs. VWEHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTO	VWEHX
Technology	24.2%	-
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Financial Services	13.5%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	-
Communication Services	10.8%	-
Industrials	8.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	0.0%
Energy	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	-

Return for Risk

GTO vs. VWEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO

GTO Risk / Return Rank: 53
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

VWEHX

VWEHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
VWEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
VWEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VWEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VWEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VWEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. VWEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTO	VWEHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.18	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.75	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.55	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.01	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.43	15.35	-7.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTO vs. VWEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VWEHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and VWEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTO	VWEHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.18	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.84	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.98	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.87	-0.35

Drawdowns

GTO vs. VWEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum VWEHX drawdown of -30.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and VWEHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTO	VWEHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.61%	-30.17%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-2.52%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.98%	-3.33%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	-13.83%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.61%	-19.69%	-0.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	0.00%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-4.29%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	0.49%	+0.36%

Volatility

GTO vs. VWEHX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX) at 0.99%. This indicates that GTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWEHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTO	VWEHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	0.99%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	2.64%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	3.24%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	4.90%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	5.27%	+0.32%

GTO vs. VWEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VWEHX's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTO vs. VWEHX - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than VWEHX's 6.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	4.75%	4.70%	4.42%	4.05%	3.47%	1.93%	4.04%	2.97%	5.25%	2.81%	2.57%	0.00%
VWEHX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares	6.26%	6.15%	6.11%	5.68%	5.11%	3.43%	4.62%	5.24%	5.94%	5.29%	5.41%	6.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTO and VWEHX in my portfolio?

GTO and VWEHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTO or VWEHX?

GTO has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to VWEHX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs VWEHX's -30.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VWEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.