GTO vs. BOND
GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GTO returned 2.93%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for BOND. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.
Performance
GTO vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has outperformed BOND with an annualized return of 2.93%, while BOND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.
GTO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
BOND
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
GTO vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 0.68% | 7.17% | 2.63% | 5.95% | -14.77% | -0.38% | 10.86% | 11.65% | -0.26% | 7.41% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.48% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 0.08% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTO and BOND is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, GTO and BOND have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.76, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GTO vs. BOND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GTO
BOND
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GTO
BOND
-
Healthcare
GTO
BOND
-
Financial Services
GTO
BOND
Consumer Cyclical
GTO
BOND
-
Communication Services
GTO
BOND
-
Industrials
GTO
BOND
-
Consumer Defensive
GTO
BOND
-
Utilities
GTO
BOND
-
Real Estate
GTO
BOND
-
Energy
GTO
BOND
-
Basic Materials
GTO
BOND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTO vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
GTO
BOND
GTO vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.23 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 7.13 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.70 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.09 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.63 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
GTO vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, roughly equal to the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and BOND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -19.71% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -3.01% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.98% | -6.12% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -19.71% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.61% | -19.71% | -0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.57% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -3.50% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.94% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GTO vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 1.19%, while PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 1.40% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 2.88% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 3.97% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 5.76% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 5.09% | +0.49% |
GTO vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTO vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than BOND's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 1.93% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 5.25% | 2.81% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GTO and BOND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BOND has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to GTO (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs BOND's -19.71%.
On 10-year performance, GTO leads with 2.93% vs 2.16% for BOND. On fees, GTO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GTO has performed better with a 2.93% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GTO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BOND.
BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.76% for GTO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.54% for BOND.
GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTO and BOND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer