GTND vs. WIMA
GTND (Goaltender ETF) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GTND is actively managed, while WIMA is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.
Performance
GTND vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTND
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTND vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | -0.05% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTND and WIMA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTND vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTND vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -4.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and WIMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTND | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -4.81% | -0.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.10% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -1.28% | -0.55% |
Volatility
GTND vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTND | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 20.03% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.03% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.03% | -1.30% |
GTND vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTND vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison
GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than WIMA's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | 0.16% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTND and WIMA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GTND.
WIMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.
They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.42% for WIMA.
Find the right allocation for GTND and WIMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer