GTND vs. TRTY
GTND (Goaltender ETF) and TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GTND is actively managed, while TRTY is passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRTY.
Performance
GTND vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTND
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | $23.11K | $23.18K | $210.02K |
| $251.33K | $266.25K | $2.95M |
GTND vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | -2.22% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTND and TRTY is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTND vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank
GTND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRTY
GTND vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTND | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTND vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum TRTY drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and TRTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTND | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -22.35% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -1.15% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -4.12% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
GTND vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTND | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 10.07% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 10.49% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 10.39% | +7.04% |
GTND vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTND vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison
GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TRTY's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 2.89% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTND and TRTY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GTND.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.
They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.44% for TRTY.
Find the right allocation for GTND and TRTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer