PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTND vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTND vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goaltender ETF (GTND) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GTND

1D
-1.04%
1M
1.06%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-1.95%
1M
1.12%
6M
13.56%
YTD
18.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTND vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTND and SFTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTND vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GTND vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTND vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SFTX drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTNDSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-12.75%

+7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-4.34%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-2.71%

+0.88%

Volatility

GTND vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTNDSFTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

22.70%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

22.70%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

22.70%

-3.97%

GTND vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTND vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SFTX's 0.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GTND
Goaltender ETF
0.16%0.00%
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.21%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTND and SFTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GTND is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GTND is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

SFTX has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.

They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTND and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer