PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. QUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a 22.30% return, which is significantly higher than QUERX's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLOX has outperformed QUERX with an annualized return of 12.69%, while QUERX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.


GTLOX

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.64%
YTD
22.30%
6M
24.43%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.69%

QUERX

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.13%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.93%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.30%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
6.42%6.98%13.98%9.55%-13.73%23.56%13.20%28.82%-0.21%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and QUERX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.87

The correlation between GTLOX and QUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. QUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QUERX
QUERX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTLOXQUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.17

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.68

1.29

+4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.44

4.33

+20.11

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the QUERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and QUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTLOXQUERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

0.96

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.72

-0.22

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than QUERX's maximum drawdown of -30.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and QUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLOXQUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-30.81%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-5.93%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-10.21%

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-22.04%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-30.81%

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.58%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-3.92%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.75%

-0.02%

Volatility

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX) at 2.07%. This indicates that GTLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLOXQUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.07%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

5.58%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

7.93%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

13.00%

+8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

15.22%

+5.69%

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QUERX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTLOX vs. QUERX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.64%, less than QUERX's 21.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.64%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
21.48%22.86%24.47%24.43%10.37%2.62%1.37%1.18%1.74%2.45%2.06%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTLOX and QUERX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to QUERX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLOX dropped -54.09% vs QUERX's -30.81%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLOX and QUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer