PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
-2.74%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%5.24%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.34%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than FNSTX's 3.34% return.


GTLOX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-7.12%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
2.61%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.19%

FNSTX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
3.34%
6M
5.71%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTLOXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.61

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

2.09

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

3.08

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.18

10.64

-6.47

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and FNSTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTLOXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.61

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.68

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.58

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and FNSTX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.35%, more than FNSTX's 4.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
18.35%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
4.03%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and FNSTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLOXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-35.82%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-8.43%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-21.97%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.63%

-7.47%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-5.25%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.44%

+0.47%

Volatility

GTLOX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) is 4.34%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that GTLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GTLOXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.52%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

12.38%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

16.05%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.77%

14.92%

+6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

18.79%

+2.06%