GTLOX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX).

GTLOX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Feb 27, 2004. FGJEX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	-2.74%	22.17%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	-2.99%	24.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly higher than FGJEX's -2.99% return.

GTLOX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -7.12%
• YTD: -2.74%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 12.08%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

FGJEX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: -2.99%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

GTLOX

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio

FGJEX

Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX

GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 40
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTLOX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTLOX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.09	-1.64

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and FGJEX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.35%, more than FGJEX's 9.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	18.35%	17.84%	25.96%	8.32%	23.58%	13.35%	9.06%	5.35%	10.53%	4.99%	1.08%	2.09%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	9.88%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTLOX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.09%	-8.32%	-45.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.63%	-8.32%	-4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-1.05%	-7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTLOX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	10.78%	+7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	10.78%	+10.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	10.78%	+10.07%