PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTFBX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than TBCIX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GTFBX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.


GTFBX

1D
0.18%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.16%
6M
3.01%
1Y
9.56%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
2.29%

TBCIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.71%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
29.00%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
2.16%4.97%3.36%8.40%-11.12%2.56%4.77%6.87%0.55%4.73%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.54%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GTFBX and TBCIX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTFBX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTFBX
GTFBX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GTFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GTFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTFBXTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.26

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.36

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

4.57

+7.16

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTFBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTFBX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTFBXTBCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.47

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.59

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.79

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.76

+0.31

Drawdowns

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTFBXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-43.26%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-16.96%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.26%

-23.06%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-43.26%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.79%

-43.26%

+27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-8.07%

+6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

5.01%

-4.20%

Volatility

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) is 1.23%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that GTFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTFBXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.57%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

12.01%

-9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

15.64%

-12.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

23.91%

-19.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

22.76%

-18.58%

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTFBX and TBCIX have an expense ratio of 0.56%.


Dividends

GTFBX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than TBCIX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
4.75%4.67%4.13%3.47%2.05%2.10%2.34%2.61%2.91%2.94%3.01%3.22%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
4.93%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTFBX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to GTFBX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTFBX dropped -15.79% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

GTFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTFBX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer