GTFBX vs. APUSX
GTFBX (T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund) and APUSX (Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GTFBX returned 1.54%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for APUSX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTFBX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for APUSX.
Performance
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than APUSX's 0.81% return.
GTFBX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
APUSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTFBX T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund | 2.16% | 4.97% | 3.36% | 8.40% | -11.12% | 2.56% | 4.68% |
APUSX Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund | 0.81% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.63% | -0.18% | -0.40% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTFBX and APUSX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTFBX vs. APUSX — Risk / Return Rank
GTFBX
APUSX
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTFBX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 5.06 | -3.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 24.81 | -21.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 68.37 | -56.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTFBX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 3.20 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 1.68 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.45 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, which is greater than APUSX's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and APUSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTFBX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.79% | -1.64% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -0.10% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.26% | -1.00% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -1.35% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -0.29% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.04% | +0.77% |
Volatility
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX) at 0.24%. This indicates that GTFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTFBX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.24% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 0.54% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 0.78% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 1.25% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 1.13% | +3.05% |
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTFBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than APUSX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTFBX vs. APUSX - Dividend Comparison
GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than APUSX's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APUSX Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund | 2.44% | 3.69% | 3.68% | 1.69% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTFBX T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund | 4.75% | 4.67% | 4.13% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 2.10% | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 3.01% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTFBX and APUSX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTFBX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to APUSX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTFBX dropped -15.79% vs APUSX's -1.64%.
APUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTFBX and APUSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer