GTEK vs. SMH
GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. GTEK is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTEK returned 34.93%/yr vs 63.68%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
GTEK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 54.10% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 75.55% return.
GTEK
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 17.20%
- YTD
- 54.10%
- 6M
- 55.31%
- 1Y
- 83.80%
- 3Y*
- 34.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
GTEK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 54.10% | 23.68% | 15.94% | 33.58% | -46.73% | -3.14% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTEK and SMH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GTEK and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
GTEK vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GTEK
SMH
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GTEK
SMH
Industrials
GTEK
SMH
-
Communication Services
GTEK
SMH
-
Basic Materials
GTEK
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GTEK
SMH
-
Real Estate
GTEK
SMH
-
Healthcare
GTEK
SMH
-
Financial Services
GTEK
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
GTEK
-
SMH
-
Energy
GTEK
-
SMH
-
Utilities
GTEK
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTEK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
GTEK
SMH
GTEK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTEK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | 5.29 | -2.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.93 | 5.29 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.73 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.70 | 11.02 | -3.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.04 | 42.34 | -17.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTEK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 5.29 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.34 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
GTEK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTEK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.77% | -84.96% | +31.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -14.93% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.49% | -35.74% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -41.09% | +13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.89% | -0.47% |
Volatility
GTEK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is 9.25%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that GTEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTEK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | 11.59% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.77% | 24.29% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 30.57% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 35.02% | -6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 32.58% | -4.27% |
GTEK vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTEK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTEK and SMH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to GTEK (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 63.68% vs 34.93% for GTEK. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GTEK has been the lower-risk option at 9.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 63.68% return vs 34.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.
GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTEK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer