GTEK vs. GSLC
GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. GTEK is actively managed, while GSLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTEK returned 34.69%/yr vs 21.11%/yr for GSLC. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
GTEK vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 9.00% return.
GTEK
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 13.61%
- YTD
- 53.34%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 79.94%
- 3Y*
- 34.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
GTEK vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 53.34% | 23.68% | 15.94% | 33.58% | -46.73% | -3.14% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.00% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTEK and GSLC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GTEK and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
GTEK vs. GSLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GTEK
GSLC
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GTEK
GSLC
Industrials
GTEK
GSLC
Communication Services
GTEK
GSLC
Basic Materials
GTEK
GSLC
Consumer Cyclical
GTEK
GSLC
Real Estate
GTEK
GSLC
Healthcare
GTEK
GSLC
Financial Services
GTEK
GSLC
Consumer Defensive
GTEK
-
GSLC
Energy
GTEK
-
GSLC
Utilities
GTEK
-
GSLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTEK vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
GTEK
GSLC
GTEK vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTEK | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.22 | 2.53 | +4.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.44 | 11.26 | +12.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTEK | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.05 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.82 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
GTEK vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than GSLC's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTEK | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.77% | -33.69% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -9.49% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.49% | -18.66% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.21% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -4.39% | -23.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.13% | +1.29% |
Volatility
GTEK vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.70%. This indicates that GTEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTEK | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 2.70% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 8.85% | +12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 11.71% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 16.62% | +11.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 17.68% | +10.60% |
GTEK vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTEK vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTEK and GSLC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTEK has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to GSLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs GSLC's -33.69%.
On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 34.69% vs 21.11% for GSLC. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 34.69% return vs 21.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.
GSLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.
GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.09% for GSLC.
GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTEK and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer