GTEK vs. GHYB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. GTEK is actively managed, while GHYB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTEK returned 30.99%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for GHYB. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.

Performance

GTEK vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 41.76% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 0.99% return.

GTEK

• 1D: -7.55%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 41.76%
• 6M: 40.44%
• 1Y: 65.24%
• 3Y*: 30.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GHYB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 6.85%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	41.76%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-3.14%
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.99%	9.38%	7.76%	12.13%	-11.02%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and GHYB is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021	0.63

The correlation between GTEK and GHYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTEK vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 80
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

GHYB

GHYB Risk / Return Rank: 63
GHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTEK	GHYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.97	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.91	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.89	2.57	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.92	11.76	+7.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTEK vs. GHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the GHYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and GHYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTEK	GHYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	1.97	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.54	-0.28

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than GHYB's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and GHYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTEK	GHYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-21.48%	-32.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-2.67%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.49%	-4.66%	-22.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.00%	-0.53%	-7.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.48%	-2.57%	-24.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	0.58%	+2.88%

Volatility

GTEK vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) at 1.09%. This indicates that GTEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTEK	GHYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.47%	1.09%	+11.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.24%	2.74%	+20.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.08%	3.52%	+23.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.49%	7.69%	+20.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.49%	8.28%	+20.21%

GTEK vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTEK vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison

GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.82%	7.00%	6.65%	6.20%	5.67%	4.46%	4.75%	5.57%	5.68%	1.45%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTEK and GHYB in my portfolio?

GTEK and GHYB have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTEK or GHYB?

GTEK has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to GHYB (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs GHYB's -21.48%.

Which ETF is better, GTEK or GHYB?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 30.99% vs 8.49% for GHYB. On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GHYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTEK or GHYB?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 30.99% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTEK or GHYB?

GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTEK or GHYB?

GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.82%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between GTEK and GHYB?

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.34% for GHYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.