GTCSX vs. CSMDX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GTCSX (Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio) and CSMDX (Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GTCSX returned 5.98%/yr vs 4.92%/yr for CSMDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTCSX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CSMDX.

Performance

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTCSX having a 13.23% return and CSMDX slightly lower at 12.65%.

GTCSX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

CSMDX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 4.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTCSX Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio	13.23%	-1.95%	8.50%	16.93%	-10.91%	28.87%	15.65%	21.12%	-16.17%	11.92%
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund	12.65%	2.72%	2.24%	18.89%	-14.89%	22.60%	8.29%	29.90%	-5.20%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GTCSX and CSMDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017	0.93

The correlation between GTCSX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTCSX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTCSX

GTCSX Risk / Return Rank: 31
GTCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GTCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GTCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GTCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GTCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CSMDX

CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTCSX	CSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.04	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.64	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	1.66	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	5.07	+1.40

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTCSX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTCSX drawdown since its inception was -59.45%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCSX and CSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTCSX	CSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.45%	-37.28%	-22.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-9.20%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.54%	-24.60%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.54%	-24.60%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-5.74%	-6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.00%	+0.47%

Volatility

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTCSX	CSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	4.12%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	10.63%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	14.65%	+3.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.88%	18.18%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.31%	19.14%	+4.17%

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTCSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTCSX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

GTCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than CSMDX's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund	2.79%	3.14%	1.33%	0.81%	4.07%	6.67%	0.38%	2.61%	4.40%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
GTCSX Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio	7.30%	8.24%	4.29%	8.45%	12.65%	4.43%	0.14%	0.23%	19.39%	10.74%	1.94%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTCSX and CSMDX in my portfolio?

GTCSX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTCSX or CSMDX?

GTCSX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to CSMDX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTCSX dropped -59.45% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.