PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSY vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSY vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSY achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GSY has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 2.86%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.42% annualized return.


GSY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
2.86%

XMMO

1D
1.31%
1M
5.63%
YTD
25.95%
6M
23.04%
1Y
40.85%
3Y*
32.12%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
20.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSY vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
1.79%4.96%5.95%5.99%0.01%0.03%1.88%3.39%2.18%1.86%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
25.95%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GSY and XMMO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2008

0.03

The correlation between GSY and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSY vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSY
GSY Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSY vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSYXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

6.07

1.36

+4.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

74.56

4.92

+69.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

349.93

19.55

+330.38

GSY vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSY Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSY and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSY vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSY drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSY and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSYXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-55.37%

+43.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-8.34%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-24.93%

+24.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.48%

-27.91%

+26.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.25%

-36.74%

+31.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-9.43%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.09%

-2.08%

Volatility

GSY vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) is 0.15%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that GSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSYXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

8.04%

-7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

16.60%

-16.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

19.82%

-19.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

21.62%

-21.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.22%

22.35%

-21.13%

GSY vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSY vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

GSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than XMMO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
4.70%4.56%5.31%4.95%1.70%0.58%1.45%2.71%2.30%1.80%1.21%1.17%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.74%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSY and XMMO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to GSY (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSY dropped -12.14% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 20.42% vs 2.86% for GSY. On fees, GSY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.74% for XMMO.

GSY is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XMMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for GSY and 0.35% for XMMO.

GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSY and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer