GSWO vs. VTI
GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSWO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSWO returned 17.89%/yr vs 21.08%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSWO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
GSWO vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSWO having a 8.59% return and VTI slightly higher at 8.72%.
GSWO
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
GSWO vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 8.59% | 18.97% | 15.29% | 16.28% | -6.15% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.72% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSWO and VTI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GSWO and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSWO vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
GSWO
VTI
GSWO vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSWO | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.93 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 13.45 | -3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSWO | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.10 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.50 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
GSWO vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSWO drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSWO and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSWO | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.77% | -55.45% | +37.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -8.92% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | -19.30% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -2.93% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -8.02% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.94% | -0.07% |
Volatility
GSWO vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSWO | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.90% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 9.55% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 12.48% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 17.44% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 18.32% | -5.30% |
GSWO vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSWO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSWO vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
GSWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSWO and VTI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSWO has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to VTI (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSWO dropped -17.77% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 21.08% vs 17.89% for GSWO. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 21.08% return vs 17.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSWO.
GSWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.
GSWO is categorized as Global Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSWO tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSWO and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSWO and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer